Precision Cost Index™
ShotMatch measureTurn reported precision and price into a comparable value measure.
rifle price × group MOALower is better. Evidence quality stays attached; no invented accuracy.Gun and gear picks with some sense.
Tell us what you’re after. Our selection engine compares fit, published precision, recoil and the cost of the whole outfit. Proprietary scoring helps sort the options; the evidence shows you why. A little homework now goes a long way come opening morning.
Build my setup ↗Let’s find your fit.
Leave your name and email to unlock your results. We’ll show you the whole outfit, what it costs and why it made the cut. Want to hear from us down the road? Field Notes is an optional extra.
Your fit, intended game, cartridge preference, factory threading set eligibility. Budget creates separate within-target and stretch groups, with an optional strict cap. Priority changes the order within each budget group; experience, carrying preference and sharing plans add recommendations to your brief. Sex and age are never substituted for body measurements or recoil tolerance. A lower-recoil preference changes the comparison order and displays tradeoffs. The 15 ft-lb reference does not automatically exclude a cartridge; exact suppressed recoil is unmeasured.
Current researched coverage: 28 researched cartridges from .22 LR through .458 Winchester Magnum, with separate rimfire, general centerfire and African large-game comparisons. New entries have specifications and factory-load sources; numerical grouping and recoil data remain Not yet verified where unverified. Component options with unresolved fit are research comparisons, not verified complete matches. Missing research may produce clearly labeled partial comparisons. Unresearched cartridges and unresolved fit or compatibility requirements show specific blockers and review controls; they are not silently replaced. Three-shot and five-shot tests and different loads are not directly equivalent. Manufacturer confirmation remains necessary for shared suppressor hosts. Stretch options show extra dollars, percentage over target and what the evidence actually supports. Budget Fit contributes 20% of the Overall Package Decision Score. Other weights: applicable precision 25%, construction 15%, fit/features 15%, optic 10%, suppressor 10%, ammunition 5%. Construction, features and load suitability are editorial judgments. Reported-evidence mode uses a disclosed neutral 60 for missing precision. Optional AAF mode uses explicitly experimental cross-caliber estimates where supported; close scores are ties, not proof of superiority. No statistically significant superiority is inferred from different review rifles or test methods.
Sorting through a hundred rifles can be a tough row to hoe. Our selection engine puts published tests, specifications and prices on a common scorecard. Set your priorities; compare ranked packages, trace the evidence and see what a change in budget buys.
Our own yardsticks. Measures marked “ShotMatch” are part of our proprietary comparison framework, with their math, evidence and limitations shown. ™ identifies an unregistered claim to a comparison name, not ownership of the formula.
Turn reported precision and price into a comparable value measure.
rifle price × group MOALower is better. Evidence quality stays attached; no invented accuracy.Translate recoil energy into a consistent reference index.
100 × recoil energy ÷ 15100 is our reference line (15 ft-lb), not a maximum. Below 100: gentler recoil. Above 100: a harder kick. Lower is better when recoil comfort is your priority; this is not a personal flinch threshold.Compare role-specific optic scores against price.
price ÷ role-specific optic scoreCustom editorial scores. Close differences are practical ties, not lab findings.An experimental model for gaps in published precision tests.
baseline grouping × applied factorOur experimental cross-caliber comparison method. See the factor, donor comparisons and confidence before using an estimate.AAF is ShotMatch’s experimental method for transferring a reported grouping baseline to another cartridge. It is an adjustment in observed group size, not a measured change in statistical variance or proof that one cartridge is inherently more accurate.
Estimates are available for selected Ruger and Tikka 6.5 PRC configurations with a documented Creedmoor baseline. They are model-level comparisons, not a test of the selected factory load. The original three- or five-shot protocol remains attached; no universal group-size conversion is assumed. Other cartridge transfers remain unavailable.
| Measure | Definition | Read it as |
|---|
Even a blind hog finds an acorn now and then. One great group is a start; repeated groups tell you more. Follow the tests, check the specifications and see where the evidence runs out.
The current research edition includes 134 model/cartridge entries across 18 rifle brands and 28 cartridges, with 81 named factory loads. Seventeen entries need a current quote before entering priced comparisons. This is an expanding research catalog, not every rifle on the market. Competition-specific coverage remains in development. Questionnaire choices outside that coverage produce either labeled starting-point comparisons or specific research blockers, without invented product evidence.
Brands covered: Ruger, Tikka, CVA, Bergara, Browning, Franchi, Savage, Weatherby, Howa, Winchester, Mossberg, Christensen Arms, Seekins Precision, Sako, Springfield Armory, Marlin, Nosler and Rigby. Coverage varies by brand and exact configuration. Sources are shown inside each result. Prices are dated public observations or planning references, not live inventory. No retailer receives preferential placement. No affiliate compensation is implemented. Custom indices organize tradeoffs; they are not independent laboratory certifications.
Get ShotMatch Field Notes: fresh gear comparisons, research updates and the occasional bit of good sense from the gun counter.